Maret 2007
- How do
civility frame change process
Frame change process
i. Mobilization the
stake holder energy to support the change
ii. Develop the
strategy to gain positive competitiveness
iii. Gain the
organizational consensus to support the change as good solution
iv. Make the change
as the organizational as the need to survive
v. Monitor the
process and response positively
- Who are
the main stakeholders in change
The main stakeholders in
change will the whole organization, because it need to keep the company survive
in the hyper competition era, the need of good CEO in the process of change
really in the critical point, as the case of Garuda Indonesia Airlines the CEO
at that time Mr. Robby Johan make turnaround for the company and his successor
Mr. Abdul Gani from the bleeding of the
company to the trustable and profitable airline in the domestic and
international
- How do
they shape the change processes
They shape the processes
through strategic change within need support and coordination from linkage
unit. Change the value of the company need to linkage with the company
environmental. The change of the workflow efficiency will increase the revenue
and the resources
Change is ongoing and takes
place through many small steps—that is, through continuous incremental change,
On the surface, the advantages of continuous incremental change are many:
- Small changes are easier to manage.
- Small changes enjoy greater probability of success
than big ones.
- Disruption is short-term and confined to small units
at any given time.
- The organization and its people are kept in a
constant state of competitiveness and change-readiness.
Transformational change makes the
direction of the whole organization going to the different direction. These
transformational changes make the break through of the organization and make
whole new business process. The characteristic of the transformational change
- Make new
organization paradigm
- Whole
organization transformation
- New
management structure
- Technology
breakthrough
- New
product or new market
Incremental change will
something continue happen in one organization to balance the equibrilium of the
organization with small but continues. The most case, change only applies to
one part of the organization and the impact will be affect to that part of the
organization.
-
To
make adjustment equibrilium of the organization
-
Change
in the part of the organization
-
Through
the ordinary management process
-
Existing
technology with new finishing
-
Existing
product with new finishing
The
notion of continuous incremental change
as the ideal organizational state is fairly recent, so its long-term effects on
individuals are not known. However, broad-based experience with continuous
process improvement, primarily in Asia and less so in Europe and the United States,
indicates that people can handle it.
The advantage of incremental change, Small changes are easier
to manage, small changes enjoy greater probability of success than big ones,
disruption is short-term and confined to small units at any given time, the
organization and its people are kept in a constant state of competitiveness and
change-readiness.
The facts that we often fail to define
our expectation clearly, we fail to provide true, effective support and we do
not recognize people effectively.
The facts that we often significant consequences for failing to perform,
and worse yet we fail to follow up on the execution of such consequences in
those cases where they need to be enacted.
Sometimes change not built on the unique strength and values of the
organization, the change should holistic because all part of the organization
take the change if the focal system not include with the holistic system it
will make the change in the stepping back.
More often the focal system make more complaining, sometimes the typical
of the person were different, as usual the management more or less have the
list to identify the focal, and take them into the negotiation process and
progress in the fist move.
Change programe fail because of ;
·
Wrong visioner to the change program, misleading to
read the situation and lead the change program to the wrong direction. Harley
Davidson had been in the difficult time when the companies try to make effecien
engine like honda or yamaha.
·
Sabotage in the process of change
·
Communicate will be very important to inform the
goal of the change and if the information and communication during the change
program not in the good condition may broke the progress.
·
Not support, the change is complicated progress it
should be support by all element of the organization also the out side element
that related to the companies.
Sometimes change not built on the unique strength and values of the
organization, the change should holistic because all part of the organization
take the change if the focal system not include with the holistic system it
will make the change in the stepping back.
